Lockout tagout (LOTO) is a critical safety procedure that is used in industrial settings to protect workers from hazardous energy sources. LOTO involves placing locks on equipment and machinery to prevent accidental startup or release of stored energy. When implementing LOTO, it is essential to consider whether to use keyed alike or keyed different locks. In this blog post, we will explore the differences between these two options and discuss their respective advantages and disadvantages.
Click here to get more.
Keyed Alike Locks
Keyed alike locks are locks that are designed to be opened by the same key. This means that if you have multiple locks on different pieces of equipment, all of the locks can be opened with the same key. Keyed alike locks are useful in situations where multiple workers need access to the same equipment or machinery. For example, if a team of workers is responsible for maintaining a production line, each worker can have a key that opens all of the locks on the equipment they are responsible for.
Advantages of Keyed Alike Locks:
Disadvantages of Keyed Alike Locks:
Keyed Different Locks
Keyed different locks are locks that are designed to be opened by different keys. This means that if you have multiple locks on different pieces of equipment, each lock can only be opened with its unique key. Keyed different locks are useful in situations where it is essential to control access to specific equipment or machinery. For example, if a particular piece of equipment is hazardous and requires specialized training to operate, keyed different locks can help ensure that only trained workers can access it.
Advantages of Keyed Different Locks:
Link to MING JIANG
Disadvantages of Keyed Different Locks:
Conclusion
The pros and cons of traditional LOTO procedures versus modern electronic LOTO systems, and how each method impacts safety, efficiency, and standards compliance.
When Wayne Rothering went to work at a large Wisconsin furniture factory in December , he probably thought he’d perform the same routines he did for a while now and go home safe after a day at work. But that was not the case. Rothering was performing maintenance on a production line that glued laminating paper to fiberboard when he became caught in the machinery's adhesive rollers. Before the accident, Rothering stopped the conveyor but did not dislodge it — a lockout alternative that the company deemed enough to prevent accidents.
The devastating death of Wayne Rothering serves as a sobering reminder of why lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures are critical for workplace safety. While some promote technological solutions as an assurance of safety, others maintain that traditional LOTO procedures remain essential. This article examines both traditional lockout tagout procedures and modern electronic LOTO systems, providing insights into how each approach impacts workplace safety, operational efficiency, and compliance with increasingly stringent safety standards.
Traditional lockout tagout procedures involve physically securing energy isolation devices with locks and applying warning tags during maintenance or servicing of equipment. This time-tested method requires workers to identify energy sources, notify affected employees, shut down equipment, isolate energy sources, apply locks and tags, verify energy isolation, and perform necessary work before systematically restoring energy through a clear removal procedure.
Below are the major advantages of traditional lockout tagout procedures:
Are you interested in learning more about Lockout Padlocks? Contact us today to secure an expert consultation!